Steve Jobs’ Evolved Leadership: Disagreement & Growth with Ed Catmull at Pixar

Steve Jobs evolved from his slave driver image, fostering productive disagreement. With Ed Catmull, Pixar's president, Jobs learned to value challenges, leading to Catmull's time-delayed argument strategy. Jobs saw conflict as a way to refine ideas and people, promoting high-talent teams.
That photo contrasts with the caricature of Jobs as a one-dimensional slave driver. Biographers and former colleagues explain a leader that grew after Apple’s board ousted him in 1985, obtaining empathy and humility during his “wild years” at NeXT and Pixar.
Jobs’ Evolution: Beyond the ‘Yes-Men’ Culture
Catmull says this slow-motion sparring reveals that Jobs did not actually want a space packed with yes-men. At Pixar and later at the Walt Disney Company(NYSE: DIS), colleagues state he expected lieutenants to hold their ground and also discharged board participants that fell short to challenge him.
One more 3rd of the time, Catmull determined Jobs had the much better disagreement. In the staying instances, Jobs tipped back and allow Catmull proceed, never reviewing the disagreement.
The two guys “disagreed rather frequently,” Catmull said, yet never had the screaming suits that specified Jobs’s very early credibility. Instead, he would certainly raise an issue, enjoy Jobs knock it down practically quickly, then wait a week before phoning back with a counterargument, only to see it disregarded once again. Occasionally that cycle repeated for months.
The Philosophy of Productive Conflict
In later interviews, Jobs advised that conceit “knocks at the door whenever you achieve success” and stressed the need for tiny, high-talent teams willing to say hard regarding concepts. Jobs likewise valued “A players,” welcomed productive yet rough teamwork and saw dispute as a rock stemless glass that brightens both items and people.
Speaking at a Stanford Entrepreneurship Corner event in 2014, Catmull remembered that Jobs as soon as told him his approach to dissent was basic: he would certainly “simply describe it to them until they understand.” As opposed to press back in the minute, Catmull discovered to finish the conversation, regroup and return later with a refined instance.
Mastering the Time-Delayed Argument
The long time Pixar president, that also led Walt Disney Animation Studios, established what he calls a “time-delayed argument” to work around Jobs’s blisteringly fast decision-making and impulse to swat away new ideas that really did not promptly fit his psychological design.
The two males “differed fairly often,” Catmull said, but never ever had the shrieking suits that defined Jobs’s very early online reputation. One more third of the time, Catmull determined Jobs had the better argument. In the continuing to be cases, Jobs stepped back and allow Catmull continue, never reviewing the disagreement.
1 Ed Catmull2 Leadership evolution
3 Pixar
4 Productive disagreement
5 Steve Jobs leadership
6 Time-delayed argument
« Justice Gorsuch’s Warning and the Battle Over Presidential Tariff Powers
